Connect with us

featured

Missouri AG Sends Cease And Desist Letters To 18 Hemp Companies, Warning More Are On The Way

Published

on


“We have issued 18 cease and desist letters so far, and more are forthcoming.”

By Rebecca Rivas, Missouri Independent

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R) has sent several cease-and-desist letters to companies selling a hemp product called THCA flower that looks exactly like marijuana flower sold at dispensaries.

Bailey’s letters threaten legal action, including injunctions, civil penalties and attorney’s fees if the companies continue to sell the products.

“When purchasing products, Missourians deserve to know if they are being exposed to dangerous side effects like psychotic episodes, hallucinations or other life-threatening risks,” said Attorney General Bailey in a statement to The Independent. “We have issued 18 cease and desist letters so far, and more are forthcoming.”

Cannabis lobbyist Eapen Thampy said about a dozen smoke shops in St. Louis received the letters, and in some cases, THCA flower makes up 60 percent to 80 percent of the companies’ inventories.

Thampy said he’s working with the companies to put together a response to the letters and preparing for potential litigation.

The action is the first major move since Bailey created a new specialized unit last fall, with the aim to assist the state’s alcohol and tobacco regulators in cracking down on intoxicating hemp products.

In September, Bailey vowed his new unit would work with the Missouri Alcohol and Tobacco Control (ATC) Division to bring legal action against licensees selling unregulated psychoactive cannabis products that violate the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.

“The ATC will assist by making its investigators available as witnesses for legal proceedings resulting from actionable referrals,” Bailey said in September. “Our enforcement toolkit will be robust from cease-and-desist letters and investigations to subpoenas and lawsuits to referrals for criminal prosecution where appropriate.”

The letters that went out last month state that the companies are “directed to cease and desist from selling” hemp products that contain more than 0.3 percent THCA on a dry weight basis. THCA is a naturally abundant cannabinoid that transforms into Delta-9 THC when smoked or heated.

However, this is not what an official cease and desist order looks like, said Jefferson City-based attorney Chuck Hatfield.

“It is an informal cease and desist,” Hatfield said. “It is not a letter that has the force and effect of law. It’s more in the nature of a request to stop.”

Under state law, if Bailey wanted to issue an official cease and desist order—as he did for Planned Parenthood in March—Hatfield said Bailey would have to issue a notice of intent first. The company would have the right to appeal through an administrative hearing, as well as challenge the order in court.

“But he hasn’t done any of that,” Hatfield said.

Bailey could also file a lawsuit under Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, and that doesn’t require a cease and desist order, he said.

Charles Alovisetti, a cannabis attorney with Vincente law firm in Boston, said the lack of a state law to support the action could put Bailey in a tricky spot.

“If the goal is to control THCA flower sales, states should regulate hemp products in their final form, including THCA flower, through clear legislation,” Alovisetti wrote in a LinkedIn post. “Letters like this may not hold up in court.”

For the third year in a row, state lawmakers failed to pass legislation to regulate intoxicating hemp products by the end of the session in May.

At issue in Bailey’s letters is THCA, which is not intoxicating in its natural state. Most marijuana flower found in dispensaries contains about 20 percent to 40 percent THCA, which would not get a person high if they consumed it without heating it. It has to be smoked to transform it into delta-9 THC, which produces the desired high for consumers. The process of heating is called decarboxylation.

Legal action against THCA hemp flower raises a dizzying debate about distinction between hemp and marijuana under federal law.

Cannabis attorney Rod Kight, who has represented hemp businesses in lawsuits nationwide, said Bailey’s letter accurately states that the sole distinction between legal hemp and illegal marijuana is the concentration of delta-9 THC, which cannot exceed 0.3 percent for hemp.

The part Bailey gets wrong, Kight said, is claiming that THCA is part of the calculation for determining whether harvested hemp or a hemp product is lawful.

“Given that Missouri law does not address THCA at all, it is clear that the attorney general is relying on recent letters from the DEA in support of its position that the concentration of THCA must be taken into account when determining the legal status of harvested hemp and hemp products,” Kight said.

However, he said the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s interpretation has caused a lot of confusion.

“Hemp growers must account for THCA before harvesting their hemp crops,” Kight said. “Thereafter, the THCA concentration does not matter under federal law or the laws of Missouri and the ‘post-decarboxylation’ test does not apply to harvested hemp or hemp products sold by wholesalers or retailers.”

Since the 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp, botanists have figured out how to breed cannabis plants capable of passing the only federal checkpoint required on hemp plants—a visit from U.S. Department of Agriculture inspectors 30 days before harvest.

At that point, the levels of delta-9 THC and THCA are below the federal threshold, but both increase before being harvested 30 days later. Kight said he believes there’s lots of marijuana flower sold in dispensaries that would probably meet this standard of hemp as well. It’s a point that’s being argued in court, he said.

“THCA is the most abundant cannabinoid that cannabis produces,” he said. “If there’s any cannabinoid that humans have truly ingested for thousands of years, it’s THCA. The hemp industry is moving kind of back towards this more natural sort of state of affairs, and I’m very pleased with that.”

This story was first published by Missouri Independent.

Federal Health Officials Revise Marijuana-Related Terminology To Reflect More Nuanced View Of Cannabinoids Like THCA And Delta-8 THC

Photo courtesy of WeedPornDaily.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron at Patreon!





Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

featured

Texas Senate Passes Bill To Criminalize Most Consumable Hemp Products, Sending It To House

Published

on


The Texas Senate has now formally pass a bill that would outlaw consumable hemp products with any detectable amount of THC—even as the governor, who recently vetoed similar legislation during the regular session, continues to call for the state to regulate rather than ban the products outright.

Senators voted 21–8 to approve SB 5, from Sen. Charles Perry (R), on third reading Friday, two days after advancing the measure on second reading. With the body’s sign-off, the proposal now proceeds to the House, where companion bill HB 5 has also been filed as part of an ongoing special legislative session.

“I’m not criminalizing something. This is already illegal,” Perry said before the final Senate vote, arguing that the hemp industry is using a “loophole” it fabricated to sell intoxicating products. “Pot has been illegal in this country for since the 30s. It’s illegal in the state today. So I’m not criminalizing anything that’s not already illegal.”

Other senators argued that it would be better to enact regulations than prohibition.

“I don’t think a ban is the right solution,” said Sen. Nathan Johnson (D). “A ban on hemp-derived THC products amounts to criminalization of something that is widely used recreationally by thousands and thousands and thousands of Texans.”

“What we should be doing is decriminalizing the social recreational use of marijuana for those who choose to use it, and decriminalizing the use of hemp by regulating it,” he said. “I do think that we have the ability as a state to regulate it. I do think that revenue from taxation of hemp-derived THC can be used to promote the very law enforcement we’re going to need in order to run a responsible regulatory regime.”

Sen. José Menéndez (D) said he appreciated that Perry and supporters of the ban want to “make sure that people, especially children don’t get hurt.”

But “I also worry about the criminalization in your bill. I think that every single arrest, every lab test, every court date caused by the new offenses of this are going to come, potentially, at the expense of focusing on other crimes,” he said.

“Cannabis has been around for thousands of years,” Menéndez pointed out. “It’ll just relocate, go underground, much like alcohol did during Prohibition… I think this bill is going to push back some people back to opioids… We can’t legislate common sense. We can’t legislate morality.”

As lawmakers consider banning consumable hemp products with any detectable amount of cannabinoids aside from CBD and CBG—which Perry has said are demonstrably nonintoxicating—others are calling for the state to instead regulate products with relatively small amounts of THC.

At a press conference Wednesday, for example, a group of Democratic state senators introduced two new cannabis-related bills, including one that would regulate the hemp market, allowing adults 21 and older to purchase hemp products containing no more than 5 mg of THC per serving.

A second new bill would effectively legalize cannabis for adult use by removing criminal penalties for possession of up to two ounces of marijuana on a person and up to 10 ounces in a single household if it’s secure and out of sight. Cultivation of up to six plants, only half of which could be mature, would also be legalized.

Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who during the state’s regular legislative session this year vetoed a similar hemp product ban, SB 3, has also backed the idea of limiting THC potency and prohibiting sales to minors rather than outlawing products entirely.

“We want to make sure adults still have the liberty to be able to have access to non-intoxicating hemp-based products,” Abbott said in an interview with The Texan, adding that “as long as

are below three milligrams of THC content, they are non-intoxicating.”

“I’m not in favor of a total ban,” he said, adding that he does support restrictions on synthetic cannabinoids and youth access to hemp products.

“I am, to be clear, in favor of a ban for those under the age of 21,” the governor explained. “I am in favor of a ban of any type of synthetic that can be added to these products that would make the product more dangerous. I am in favor of a ban of any hemp-based product that reaches an intoxication level, and that is more than three milligrams of THC.”

As Abbott has done in other interviews around the hemp bill, he again gave a somewhat confusing explanation of what he views as allowable THC limits in hemp, variously saying there should be a “three percent” or “three milligram” cap, which is a meaningful difference.

On the House side, meanwhile, the sponsor of HB 5—which is currently identical to SB 5—has said that he intends the bill’s language to be “a starting point,” suggesting future changes would be made based on feedback to the proposal.

“We will hear many hours of testimony and allow that testimony to inform our future direction and decisions,” Rep. Gary VanDeaver (R), who chairs the House Committee on Public Health—where HB 5 will be first considered—wrote in a recent letter to the panel’s other members.

Under the current proposal, consumable hemp products with any amount of THC—or any other cannabinoid besides CBD and CBG—would be illegal. Even mere possession would be punishable as a Class B misdemeanor, carrying up to 180 days in jail and a $2,000 fine.

Some advocates are hopeful that either SB 5 or its House counterpart could see revisions as they make their way through the legislative process—either to affirmatively regulate the hemp market or to at least ease some of the criminal penalties on individuals found in possession of the affected products.

Heather Fazio, director of the advocacy group Texas Cannabis Policy Center, urged supporters in an email to reach out to their representatives and call for changes.

“It is my hope,” she wrote, “that HB 5 will be re-worked to regulate THC and eliminate criminal penalties for possession.”

(Disclosure: Fazio supports Marijuana Moment’s work via a monthly Patreon pledge.)

As the ban legislation has advanced, many policymakers have Notably, Abbott in June signed a bill into law that expanded the state’s list of medical cannabis qualifying conditions, adding chronic pain, traumatic brain injury (TBI), Crohn’s disease and other inflammatory bowel diseases, while also allowing end-of-life patients in palliative or hospice care to use marijuana.

SB 5 and companion HB 5 are among a small handful of bills introduced for the new special session to address consumable hemp products.

Among other proposals are measures to require extensive product warning labels and limit how hemp products are packaged.

Two other newly introduced bills are HB 160 from Rep. Charlene Ward Johnson (D) and SB 39 from Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D).

The former would require a number of warning labels to be carried on hemp products with any more than trace amounts of THC, cautioning that the products can cause “cannabis poisoning that can be life-threatening to children,” harm brain development in youth, increase “risk of mental disorders like psychosis and schizophrenia” and lead to anxiety, depression and substance abuse disorders.

SB 39, meanwhile, would prohibit hemp products from being packaged or marketed “in a manner attractive to children,” limiting packaging shaped like humans, animals, fruit, cartoons or “another shape that is attractive to minors” as well as packaging that looks similar to legal products already marketed to children, for example candy or juice. It would also outlaw misleading product packaging. Violations would be a Class A misdemeanor, carrying up to a year in jail and a $4,000 fine.

Separately, Rep. Nicole Collier (D) introduced a one-page bill, HB 42, designed to protect consumers in the state from criminal charges if what they believed was a legal hemp product turned out to contain excessive amounts of THC, making it illegal marijuana. It would prevent the criminalization of someone found in possession of a product that’s labeled as hemp but is determined to contain “a controlled substance or marihuana.”

In order for the person to obtain the legal protection, the product would need to have been purchased “from a retailer the person reasonably believed was authorized to sell a consumable hemp product.”

Another bill—HB 195, introduced by Rep. Jessica González (D)—would legalize marijuana for people 21 and older, allowing possession of up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis, with no more than 15 grams of that amount being in concentrated form.

Yet another proposal would order state officials to conduct a study on testing for THC intoxication.

As for what Texans themselves want to see from their representatives, proponents of reining in the largely unregulated intoxicating hemp industry in Texas shared new polling data indicating that majorities of respondents from both major political parties support outlawing synthetic cannabinoids, such as delta-8 THC.

The survey also found that respondents would rather obtain therapeutic cannabis products through a state-licensed medical marijuana program than from a “smoke shop selling unregulated and untested hemp.”

Ahead of the governor’s veto last month of SB 3—the earlier hemp product ban—advocates and stakeholders had delivered more than 100,000 petition signatures asking Abbott to reject the measure. Critics argued that the industry—which employs an estimated 53,000 people—would be decimated if the measure became law.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron at Patreon!



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading

featured

First Kentucky Medical Cannabis Dispensary Approved to Open This Fall

Published

on


Kentucky officials have approved the commonwealth’s first medical cannabis dispensary for operations, the Louisville Courier-Journal reports.

Gov. Andy Beshear (D) announced the approval of The Post Dispensary in a social media post on Thursday, “Great news, Kentucky — today, we approved the state’s first medical cannabis dispensary for operations in Beaver Dam.”

“This is another step forward as we work to ensure Kentuckians with serious medical conditions have access to the medicine they need and deserve.” — Beshear, in a statement

The governor said the shop is expected to open its doors this fall — however, the exact date it will open remains undetermined, the report said.

Kentucky approved its medical cannabis law in 2023, and the medical cannabis legalization policy formally took effect on January 1 of this year. Officials awarded the program licenses via lottery in 2024; the lottery-based licensing process has prompted lawsuits by rejected applicants, however, and even an investigation by the Kentucky state Auditor Allison Ball.

More than 16,000 patients have been certified to use medical cannabis, and more than 11,500 patients have been issued their medical cannabis IDs, the Lexington Herald-Reporter reports. Qualifying conditions for the program include cancer, PTSD, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, and others.

Based in Portland, Oregon, Graham is Ganjapreneur’s Chief Editor. He has been writing about the legalization landscape since 2012 and has been contributing to Ganjapreneur since our official launch in…



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading

featured

Senate Votes To Let VA Doctors Recommend Medical Marijuana To Military Veterans, While Setting Aside Hemp THC Ban

Published

on


The Senate has approved large-scale spending legislation that includes provisions to allow U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) doctors to recommend medical marijuana to military veterans living in legal states.

The appropriations package that senators passed on Friday was also amended to omit a controversial proposed ban consumable hemp products with any quantifiable amount of THC.

After being cleared by the Senate Appropriations Committee last month, the full chamber advanced the package covering Military Construction, Veterans Affairs (MilConVA) and Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration (AgFDA) in a 87-9 vote.

In committee, members adopted an amendment to the MilConVA measure from Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) that contains the cannabis and veterans language. For AgFDA, the bill initially featured hemp language that stakeholders argued would devastate the industry, but an agreed-upon amendment removed those provisions following tense deliberations.

The Merkley amendment attached to the underlying defense appropriations measure is meant to mirror standalone legislation titled the Veterans Equal Access Act. The text of the proposal adopted by the Senate committee is not identical to what the House passed as part of its own MilConVA appropriations measure in June.

On the House side, Reps. Brian Mast (R-FL) and Dave Joyce (R-OH)—who are both co-chairs of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus—sponsored the adopted companion amendment, which would increase veterans’ access to state medical marijuana programs and eliminate a current VA directive barring the department’s doctors from issuing cannabis recommendations.

Mast in February filed the standalone Veterans Equal Access Act—marking one of the latest attempt to enact the measure that’s enjoyed bipartisan support over recent sessions.

In past years, both the House and Senate have included provisions in their respective MilConVA measures that would permit VA doctors to make the medical cannabis recommendations, but they have never been enacted into law.

Because both chambers again adopted differing language this year, the matter will once more be a topic of conversation in conference committee or informal bicameral negotiations and, as such, could end up being left out of the final package sent to the president this time, as has been the case in the past.

Here’s the text of the House version: 

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Veterans Affairs in this Act may be used to enforce Veterans Health Directive 1315 as it relates to—

(1) the policy stating that ‘VHA providers are prohibited from completing forms or registering Veterans for participation in a State-approved marijuana program’;

(2) the directive for the ‘Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Operations and Management’ to ensure that ‘medical facility Directors are aware that it is VHA policy for providers to assess Veteran use of marijuana but providers are prohibited from recommending, making referrals to or completing paperwork for Veteran participation in State marijuana programs’; and

(3) the directive for the ‘VA Medical Facility Director’ to ensure that ‘VA facility staff are aware of the following’ ‘[t]he prohibition recommending, making referrals to or completing forms and registering Veterans for participation in State-approved marijuana programs’.”

The Senate language reads:

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Veterans Affairs in this Act may be used in a manner that would—

(1) interfere with the ability of a veteran to participate in a medicinal marijuana program approved by a State;

(2) deny any services from the Department to a veteran who is participating in such a program; or

(3) limit or interfere with the ability of a health care provider of the Department to make appropriate recommendations, fill out forms, or take steps to comply with such a program.”

Also attached to the MilConVA bill that the Senate approved is a report that contains cannabis and psychedelics provisions, including a call to allow VA doctors to recommend medical cannabis if the federal government reschedules it.

If rescheduling does happen, “VA should consider issuing guidance allowing VHA doctors and other personnel to discuss, recommend, and facilitate access to medical marijuana in States with state-legal medical marijuana programs to the extent allowable under Federal law,” the report says.

Another section discusses the potential for cannabis to be used as an alternative treatment option for veterans, urging VA to study “the relationship between treatment programs involving medical marijuana that are approved by States, the access of veterans to such programs, and a reduction in opioid use and abuse among veterans.”

Additionally, a section of the report for MilConVA addresses psychedelics-assisted therapy, noting that members understand “VA and other relevant Federal agencies are undertaking research to evaluate the efficacy of psychedelic-assisted therapies in treating PTSD, major depressive disorder, and other conditions.”

The committee is mandating that VA produce a report to Congress that lays out the status of research into the topic within 180 days of the bill’s enactment, and it’s further directing the agency to “initiate a longitudinal study of veterans participating in such therapies and track outcomes over a period of five years.”

The report further discusses GI Bill benefits as they related to cannabis, noting that “VA policy determinations have restricted the ability of veterans to access their earned benefits, including GI Bill Benefits.”

Under the AgFDA appropriations measure that the Senate also passed as part of a package on Friday, there are no longer provisions hemp industry stakeholders said would effectively eradicate the market by banning consumable hemp products with any “quantifiable” amount of THC.

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who ushered in the federal legalization of hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill, championed the THC criminalization language. But while he got it included in the base bill for Ag/FDA, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) threatened to procedurally hold up the process if it stayed in, forcing McConnell’s hand. Paul’s amendment to strike the language passed as part of an en bloc package on the floor on Friday.

That came after a verbal lashing from McConnell, who took to the floor earlier in the day to criticize those who opposed the ban, including Paul.

“In order to move the package forward, I allowed my language to be stripped from the bill,” McConnell said. “But my effort to root out bad actors, protect our children, support farmers and reaffirm our original legislative intent will continue.”

The hemp language in the Senate spending bill was nearly identical to what the House Appropriations Committee passed in June, with noted cannabis prohibitionist Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) leading the charge.

Meanwhile, Paul recently filed a standalone bill that would go in the opposite direction of the hemp ban, proposing to triple the concentration of THC that the crop could legally contain, while addressing multiple other concerns the industry has expressed about federal regulations.

The senator introduced the legislation, titled the Hemp Economic Mobilization Plan (HEMP) Act, in June. It mirrors versions he’s sponsored over the last several sessions.


Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.

Meanwhile, a GOP-controlled House committee last month approved an amendment attached to a must-pass defense bill that would require a “progress report” on an ongoing psychedelic therapy pilot program for active duty military service members and veterans.

However, while Congress has been notably amenable to psychedelics research proposals in recent sessions, the House Rules Committee separately blocked a bipartisan amendment to a spending bill led by Rep. Morgan Luttrell (R-TX) that would have given DOD another $10 million to support clinical trials into the therapeutic potential of substances such as ibogaine and psilocybin.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron at Patreon!



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading
video38 minutes ago

Kentucky's first medical cannabis dispensary gets approval

featured52 minutes ago

Texas Senate Passes Bill To Criminalize Most Consumable Hemp Products, Sending It To House

video2 hours ago

2 charged with murder in deaths of 5 at cannabis operation

featured2 hours ago

First Kentucky Medical Cannabis Dispensary Approved to Open This Fall

video3 hours ago

Attorney General Mike Hilgers files lawsuit against Wyoming cannabis corporation

featured3 hours ago

Senate Votes To Let VA Doctors Recommend Medical Marijuana To Military Veterans, While Setting Aside Hemp THC Ban

video4 hours ago

Kentucky’s first medical cannabis dispensary approved to open

featured4 hours ago

Japanese Study Busts the ‘Gateway Drug’ Myth, With Gov’t Support

video5 hours ago

New Haven smoke shop’s registration suspended after allegedly having illegal cannabis products

20255 hours ago

Star signs and cannabis strains: August 2025 horoscopes

featured5 hours ago

Adult-Use Cannabis Sales Launch in Delaware

video6 hours ago

North Carolina sets sights on legal cannabis, public input open

featured6 hours ago

Florida Marijuana Campaign Has Now Collected 75 Percent Of Signatures Needed To Put Legalization On 2026 Ballot

video7 hours ago

VIDEO | “A monumental occasion” – legal cannabis sales for recreational use begin | The Latest from WDEL News

featured7 hours ago

Cannabis Is Becoming the Ultimate Summer Vibe

featured8 hours ago

Michigan Signs Tribal Cannabis Compact With Bay Mills Indian Community

featured9 hours ago

Is Cannabis Really Legal If You Can’t Grow Your Own Weed?

video10 hours ago

Medical marijuana program to expand on Aug. 1

featured10 hours ago

Ganjapreneur Launches Paid Subscriptions for Cannabis Operators

video11 hours ago

Recreational marijuana sales begin in Delaware

featured11 hours ago

Trump Privately Committed To Reschedule Marijuana ‘Multiple Times’ Since Taking Office, CEO Says

video12 hours ago

Inside one of 12 locations that can now sell recreational marijuana in Delaware

featured12 hours ago

The Best Rum Drinks For Summer

featured14 hours ago

Curaleaf Opens 68th Florida Dispensary in St. Augustine

Trending