A newly filed pair of GOP-led congressional bills would prevent people from using federal financial assistance at marijuana dispensaries.

As part of a broader piece of legislation from Rep. Darin LaHood (R-IL) and Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) that aims to change rules around welfare requirements, there are provisions that mirror a standalone measure introduced in prior sessions called the “Welfare For Needs Not Weed Act.”

The provision in the new Jobs and Opportunity with Benefits and Services (JOBS) for Success Act represents the latest in a series of attempts over recent sessions to block low-income individuals from accessing Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds at cannabis businesses.

According to a memo on an earlier version of the measure, it would prohibit people “from using welfare benefit cards for purchases at stores that sell marijuana, as well as forbids the withdrawal of welfare cash at ATMs in such stores.”

The title of the section itself—”Welfare For Needs Not Weed”—has on its own drawn the ire of legalization advocates who argue it unnecessarily plays into negative cannabis stereotypes. They also argue that it’s inappropriate to tell medical cannabis patients they can’t use funds for their medicine.

Text of the relevant section of the legislation is short, simply adding “any establishment that offers marihuana… for sale” to the list of places where TANF funds on electronic benefit transfer cards couldn’t be used.

The legislation’s Republican sponsors have described the bill broadly as a set of “common-sense reforms to reauthorize, modernize, and reform” the TANF program.

“Nobody wants to depend on the government’s help, and this bill is a crucial step in modernizing the TANF program to ensure that we’re helping families escape the cycle of poverty and equipping them for self-sufficiency,” Daines, who has sponsored bipartisan legislation to allow marijuana businesses to access banking services, said in a press release last week. “By promoting work ethic and responsibility, we can cut straight to the root causes of economic disadvantage and child poverty, and our families will be far better off.”

—
Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.
—

Relatedly, in February Rep. Pat Fallon (R-TX) peddled a stigmatizing message to justify a separate bill on adding work requirements for certain federal benefits, implying that it’s necessary to prevent people from buying marijuana with taxpayer dollars and lazing around on the couch while eating Cheetos.

Daines, for his part, also included language in an earlier welfare-related bill in 2021 that would have made it so people could not use TANF funds at marijuana dispensaries.

In 2018, the House Ways and Means Committee approved a prior version of the legislation as part of a broader jobs bill, but it was not enacted into law.

Congressional Resolution On Reparations For Black Americans Points To War On Drugs As A Key Cause Of Ongoing Disparities

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) says that states that have legalized marijuana are providing cover for illicit cultivation operations by foreign cartels—while at the same time implicitly acknowledging that ongoing prohibition in other states creates opportunities for that cannabis to be sold on the illegal market.

The agency’s 2025 National Drug Threat Assessment that was released on Thursday includes a section on marijuana trafficking, claiming that cartels and other organized crime groups “operate under business registrations granted by state licensing authorities in jurisdictions where marijuana cultivation and sales are ‘legal’ at the state level.”

“However, absent overt evidence such as the trafficking of marijuana across state lines or the commission of non-drug crimes such as money laundering and human trafficking, it can be difficult for law enforcement to immediately identify violations or discover an illegal grow,” the report says. “Asian [Transnational Criminal Organizations, or TSOs] defy restrictions on plant quantities, production quotas, and non-licensed sales, and hide behind state-by-state variations in laws governing plant counts, registration requirements, and accountability practices.”

DEA suggested that cartels are leveraging state cannabis markets by transporting “large amounts of marijuana directly from ‘legal’ states to states that have not legalized recreational use and those where state-level recreational approval is sufficiently recent to not yet have an established, regulated cannabis industry.”

Underlying that analysis seems to be a perhaps inadvertent acknowledgment by DEA that cartels are profiting off ongoing prohibition outside of legal states—indicating that the main demand for illicit marijuana isn’t coming from within states that provide regulated access to consumers but instead those where cannabis remains criminalized.

Implicit in that analysis is exactly what advocates have long argued: Legalization disrupts the illegal market.

Throughout the report, DEA notably put quotation marks around the words “legal” and “legally,” seemingly emphasizing the federal government’s position that state-regulated marijuana is still not considered legal. At the same time, however it’s notable that part of its analysis talks about states that have “not yet” created a legal marketplace, a seeming nod to the reality that public momentum continues to be behind enacting legalization in more and more places.

The agency also claimed in the report that, because of the potency of cannabis grown by Chinese trafficking operators, demand has grown in the U.S. and western Europe. “Overseas shipments commonly travel via commercial flights from the United States and Canada, or on container vessels departing from a U.S. port,” according to the report.

“DEA and our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners must continue to adapt and work together to attack global drug trafficking organizations at every level,” DEA Acting Administrator Robert Murphy said in a press release. “By joining forces to reduce supply and demand, we can destroy the drug trafficking networks and achieve a safer and healthier future for all Americans.”

The report’s mentions of marijuana seem to tell two seemingly contradictory stories: On the one hand, DEA is claiming that legal cannabis states are a hub for illicit trafficking; on the other hand, it’s recognizing that the marijuana products that are being grown illicitly outside of regulatory confines in those legal states are being trafficked to other states where cannabis remains prohibited, which advocates would point out is one of the key arguments in favor of enacting legalization in every state and federally.

This comes amid a Senate confirmation hearing process for President Donald Trump’s pick to lead DEA, Terrance Cole, who recently refused to commit to rescheduling marijuana, or to say how he’d approach federal enforcement in states that have legalized cannabis.

In written responses to questions from two Democratic senators as part of his confirmation, the nominee largely demurred on multiple questions around marijuana policy issues, including a pending proposal to move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III that was initiated under the Biden administration.

Cole has previously voiced concerns about the dangers of marijuana and linked its use to higher suicide risk among youth.

While he gave noncommittal answers when asked about rescheduling in the written questions, Cole said during an in-person hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee last month that examining the rescheduling proposal will be “one of my first priorities” if he’s confirmed for the role, saying it’s “time to move forward” on the stalled process—but again without clarifying what end result he would like to see.

Trump initially chose Hillsborough County, Florida Sheriff Chad Chronister to lead DEA, but the prospective nominee—who strongly advocated for marijuana decriminalization—withdrew from consideration in January amid scrutiny from conservative lawmakers over the sheriff’s record on COVID-related public safety enforcement actions.

As far as the marijuana rescheduling process is concerned, DEA recently notified an agency judge that the proceedings are still on hold—with no future actions currently scheduled as the matter sits before the acting administrator, Derek Maltz, who has called cannabis a “gateway drug” and linked its use to psychosis.

Meanwhile, although shutting down licensed marijuana dispensaries doesn’t “rise to the top” of his priorities, an interim U.S. attorney who recently warned a Washington, D.C. cannabis shop about potential federal law violations says his “instinct is that it shouldn’t be in the community.” He’s since rescinded his consideration for unrelated reasons, however.

Separately, last month, an activist who received a pardon for a marijuana-related conviction during Trump’s first term paid a visit to the White House, discussing future clemency options with the recently appointed “pardon czar.”

A marijuana industry-backed political action committee (PAC) has also released a series of ads over recent weeks that have attacked Biden’s cannabis policy record as well as the nation of Canada, promoting sometimes misleading claims about the last administration while making the case that Trump can deliver on reform.

Its latest ad accused former President Joe Biden and his DEA of waging a “deep state war” against medical cannabis patients—but without mentioning that the former president himself initiated the rescheduling process that marijuana companies want to see completed under Trump.

Trump’s VA Secretary Touts Being ‘One Of The First’ In His Role To Support Psychedelic Medicine For Veterans

Photo courtesy of Mike Latimer.

A GOP Pennsylvania senator who supports marijuana legalization is seemingly suggesting that lawmakers pump the brakes on the push to enact the policy change amid resistance to reform within his caucus and instead pass a bill to create a new regulatory body that can begin overseeing medical cannabis and hemp while preparing to eventually handle the adult-use market as well.

At the same time, a Democratic legislator who sponsored a House-passed bill to legalize marijuana with state-run stores that was rejected by the Senate this week is slamming the industry, arguing that large cannabis businesses are putting corporate interests ahead of the need to end prohibition.

In the Senate, Sen. Dan Laughlin (R) has long supported legalizing cannabis and sponsored bipartisan reform bills to create a system of regulated sales. But in an op-ed published by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Friday, he said Pennsylvania should first take steps to make sure the state is “ready to act when legalization becomes law” by establishing a Cannabis Control Board now.

“Legalization of adult-use cannabis in Pennsylvania is no longer a matter of if, it is when. And when that day comes, the state should not be scrambling to build a regulatory system from scratch,” he said. “A transparent, efficient framework should already be in place, one designed to support a safe, well-regulated cannabis industry from day one.”

Rather than move forward on broad legislation to enact legalization this session—a proposal that could face the same fate at the House-passed bill in the Republican-controlled Senate—Laughlin says lawmakers should pass a bill to create a Cannabis Control Board that could also more immediately take over regulatory control of the existing medical marijuana program that’s currently run by the Department of Health and also oversee the intoxicating hemp product market.

“Pennsylvania should be ready to act when legalization becomes law,” he said. “With thoughtful design, the board would regulate adult-use cannabis in a way that makes the rules and regulations clear and promotes innovation, equity, and economic growth, and doesn’t stifle the industry through bureaucracy.”

“The idea takes cues from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB), but this should not be a direct copy,” he said, seemingly referencing the House bill proposal to have state-run cannabis shops similar to how alcohol is sold there. “The centralized model used in alcohol sales has some advantages, but also significant drawbacks.”

“A Cannabis Control Board would allow the state to create an agency tailored specifically for this purpose. It could handle licensing, enforce compliance, oversee testing and safety standards, and manage tax revenues in a transparent way. Just as important, it could act as a central point of contact for businesses, municipalities, and the public, eliminating confusion and ensuring consistency across the board.”

The creation of the board, he argued, could mitigate the risks of “licensing delays, overly complex regulations, and rigid centralized control have all been problems in other states and within our own liquor system.”

“A proactive approach gives everyone, from law enforcement to local governments to public health officials, the time and tools to prepare. It allows for the development of clear rules on advertising, packaging, testing, and product safety,” Laughlin said. “It enables public education efforts focused on youth prevention and responsible use. And it gives businesses time to adapt to a system that is understandable, consistent, and fair.”

“Establishing a Cannabis Control Board now is a practical, forward-looking step. It would allow the Commonwealth to act with intention, build a system that reflects Pennsylvania values, and position itself for a smoother, more equitable rollout of legalization. The opportunity is here. The planning should start now.”

While Laughlin didn’t pit blame on his caucus for derailing earlier attempts to pass legalization altogether, the implication seems clear that, while he supports comprehensive reform, he doesn’t necessarily see a path forward in the short-term within the GOP Senate. The House bill passed the Democratic chamber by just one vote along party lines before being defeated in the Senate committee that Laughlin chairs.

Laughlin previewed the forthcoming legislation to create a Cannabis Control Board in a cosponsorship memo in March, arguing that, “by consolidating oversight under a single regulatory board, we can eliminate inconsistencies, enhance transparency, and provide the structure needed to responsibly manage this industry.”

In a press release from the Pennsylvania Senate GOP caucus following the committee vote on the House bill, the senator added that he’s “said repeatedly that a state-store model for adult-use cannabis will not pass the Senate.”

“That’s not an opinion, it’s a fact,” he said. “The House moving HB 1200 forward and sending it to the Senate was not a serious effort to legalize cannabis. It was a political move meant to shift blame for inaction, when I have yet to receive a single call from House leadership or the bill sponsors to discuss the concept.”

“There are serious challenges we can and should address right now,” he said. “Our medical marijuana program needs critical reforms. Hemp-derived THC products are being sold openly in gas stations and tobacco shops with no regulation, no testing and no age verification. And the continued reliance on the black market poses real risks to public safety.”

“I remain committed to crafting a cannabis bill that can pass the Senate and be signed into law to benefit all Pennsylvanians. That starts with honest dialogue from everyone involved, including House leadership and the governor, to develop a realistic approach–not political theater.”

Meanwhile, the Democratic chair of the House Health Committee, Rep. Dan Frankel (D), is sharply criticizing the legislature’s inaction on legalization, as well as the broader corporate industry that he claims is hijacking the debate on reform for profit-motivated reasons.

“Last week, something unusual happened in Harrisburg. A Senate Republican committee chair brought up the cannabis legalization bill I introduced with Rep. Rick Krajewski (D)—just to vote it down,” he said in an op-ed for TribLive. “It was all theater. No legalization bill will become law without a negotiation with HB 1200, the House-passed legislation. So why put on the show? Because we’ve hit a nerve.”

“HB 1200 doesn’t follow the same playbook other states used when they legalized weed. And that’s exactly why the big cannabis companies are worried,” he said. “Make no mistake: the industry would rather keep cannabis illegal in Pennsylvania than see it legalized in a way that doesn’t boost their stock prices–just ask the ‘ResponsiblePA Coalition,’ their audaciously named new industry group. They want control. And when they get it, public health, small businesses and community benefits all get pushed aside. We think Pennsylvania deserves better.”

In response to the statement, ResponsiblePA spokesperson Brit Crampsie told Marijuana Moment on Friday that, “we appreciate Rep. Frankel’s many contributions to the legalization movement and now it’s time to move forward with a logical, bipartisan solution that grows Pennsylvania jobs and creates real economic opportunity.

Frankel, for his part, said legalization “should be about more than opening dispensaries.”

“It should be about repairing the harm that’s been done and building something better. That’s what HB 1200 does. It’s about putting Pennsylvanians first—whether they use cannabis or not,” he said.

“One hundred and two House Democrats have already said loud and clear: this is the kind of legalization Pennsylvania needs — one that prioritizes public health, racial justice, and real economic opportunity. If Senate Republicans have a better plan to meet those goals, we’re ready to listen. Pennsylvania has a chance to get this right. Let’s not hand it over to the highest bidder.”

Meanwhile, the governor of Pennsylvania is criticizing the GOP-controlled Senate for “ignoring” the will of voters after killing the House-passed bill to legalize marijuana.

Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) said during an interview with WILK News Radio on Wednesday that the bill’s rejection does a disservice to the bipartisan majority of voters in the commonwealth who support legalization, as well as the state itself that’s losing out on potential tax revenue to neighboring states that have enacted the policy change.

“Look, clearly people want it,” Shapiro, who included legalization in his budget request for the third time this year, said. “Poll after poll shows that.”

Following Tuesday’s Senate committee vote, lawmakers from both chambers who support legalization have been trading criticisms about each other’s roles in the stalled push to end prohibition.

Prior to the Senate panel’s vote this week, Pennsylvania’s Republican attorney general said that while he doesn’t currently support the House-passed marijuana legalization bill, he’s open to changing his mind about the policy change after continuing to review the details.

For what it’s worth, a recent poll found that Pennsylvania voters say they favor a model where cannabis is sold by licensed private businesses, rather than through a system of state-run stores.

The governor has repeatedly called for adult-use marijuana legalization. However, he hasn’t endorsed the specific idea of having a state-controlled model.

Rep. Abby Major (R)—who is sponsoring another forthcoming legalization bill that envisions a traditional private sales model alongside Rep. Emily Kinkead (D)—said during the House floor debate on HB 1200 that she stands opposed to the competing bill, emphasizing that she disagrees with the state-run stores proposal.

While Democrats control the House and governor’s office, they will still need to reach a deal with the GOP-controlled Senate to effectuate change. And in addition to the conflicting perspectives among pro-legalization legislators, another potential barrier to reform is exactly that political dynamic.

Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R) said that while he sees a “path forward” for enacting regulations for separate gaming-related reform, “I’m not seeing consensus between the four caucuses and the governor collectively that [marijuana legalization] should be a priority.”

Regardless of which direction Pennsylvania lawmakers do—or don’t—go on marijuana legalization this session, a survey released in April shows a majority of adults in the state support the reform—and opposition to the policy change has fallen by nearly 50 percent over the last decade.

Kinkead has made the case in another recent interview that legalizing cannabis in Pennsylvania will help the state mitigate public health and safety concerns associated with the illicit market, including the fact that unregulated products can be laced with fentanyl.

The lawmaker previously introduced a separate bipartisan marijuana legalization bill, alongside 15 other cosponsors, last September. It did not advance, however.

Meanwhile, Laughlin recently called for the creation of a state “legacy” fund, using tax revenue from adult-use marijuana sales and gaming to make long-term investments in the Commonwealth’s economy.

The senator argued that, beyond using any resulting tax revenue to fund day-to-day projects and public services, the state should earmark a portion of those tax dollars for a fund to “provide a sustainable source of prosperity that lasts for generations.”

Another GOP Pennsylvania senator, Sen. Gene Yaw (R), is backing the push to legalize marijuana in the commonwealth, pointing out that, historically, prohibition “has not turned out well,” noting the country’s experience with alcohol criminalization.

Pennsylvania House Speaker Joanna McClinton (D) recently said that Democrats are ready to pass a marijuana legalization bill this session, but that the party “will need Republican support” to get the job done—adding that it will be a “heavy lift.”

Polls have shown bipartisan support for legalization among voters, but the reform has consistently stalled in the legislature, owing in large part to GOP opposition. But not all Republican members are against the policy change—and one recently said she felt her party should seize the “opportunity to snatch” the issue from Democrats.

Separately in March, the Pennsylvania House approved a bill sponsored by Frankel that’s meant to strengthen safety standards and oversight of the state’s medical marijuana program as lawmakers work to advance adult-use legalization.

While Pennsylvania’s medical cannabis program was enacted nearly a decade ago, lawmakers say the measure, which now heads to the Senate, is necessary to improve testing compliance, product audits and lab inspections, among other aspects of the industry.

Meanwhile, Pennsylvania Democratic lawmakers recently introduced a bill that would allow farmers and other small agriculture operators to sell marijuana they cultivate to existing growers and and processors if the state moves to legalize adult-use cannabis.

Separately, an independent Pennsylvania agency is projecting more tax dollars to be generated from adult-use marijuana sales compared to what the governor’s office has estimated, although it expects significantly less overall revenue from cannabis legalization due to differing views on licensing fees.

Pennsylvania officials have also launched a new survey that invites legal marijuana businesses across the country to provide information about their operations to help the state better understand the cannabis industry as lawmakers consider enacting adult-use legalization this session.

—
Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.
—

Also, in a video interview released in March, the governor emphasized that the state is “losing out” to others that have already enacted adult-use legalization, while maintaining a policy that’s enriched the illicit market.

“I think it’s an issue of freedom and liberty. I mean, if folks want to smoke, they should be able to do so in a safe and legal way,” he said. “We should shut down the black market—and, by the way, every state around us is doing it. Pennsylvanians are driving to those other states and paying taxes in those other states.”

The state’s agriculture secretary separately told lawmakers that he’s fully confident that his department is in a “really good” position to oversee an adult-use marijuana program if lawmakers act.

Meanwhile, in February, top Pennsylvania police and health officials told lawmakers they are prepared to implement marijuana legalization if the legislature moves forward with the reform—and that they stand ready to work together as the details of legislation to achieve it are crafted.

Amid the growing calls for marijuana legalization in Pennsylvania, a GOP state senator said prohibition has been a “disaster,” and a regulated sales model for cannabis—similar to how alcohol and tobacco are handled—could serve as an effective alternative.

A Republican Pennsylvania senator also recently defended the push to legalize and regulate marijuana, calling it “the most conservative stance” on the issue.

DeSantis Signs Bill To Criminalize Psychedelic Mushroom Spores In Florida