This week, a new acting chief Derek Maltz was named to the Drug Enforcement Administration, and despite previous negative comments from Maltz, the cannabis industry’s response remains cautious.
Many in the industry viewed departing Chief Anne Milgram negatively, blaming her for slow walking the rescheduling of cannabis. She didn’t move quickly, but she also allowed the process to continue moving forward. But at the same time, she continued to treat cannabis as her predecessors did: as a Schedule I substance.
Hoping for the best
Acting DEA Chief Derek Maltz
Despite Maltz’s past comments linking school shootings to obsessive cannabis use and being generally anti-cannabis, many industry participants are clinging to one of his somewhat positive comments: “If there’s scientific evidence to support [cannabis rescheduling], then so be it. But you’ve got to let the scientists evaluate it.”
The appointment of Maltz wasn’t a particular concern for some, who noted that policy likely will be driven by the president.
“President Trump is off to a fast start as the 47th POTUS with border security and the horrible implications of cartels and drug trafficking on America as an area of major importance, so we are not surprised by the recent appointment of Derek Maltz as the acting administrator of the U.S. DEA.,” Morgan Paxhia, managing director of Poseidon, said. “…We think it is better to focus less on any appointee’s dated/biased views on cannabis and more so on POTUS as the primary input for potential legislative reform and as it pertains to the scheduling of cannabis.”
David Culver, senior vice president of public Affairs of the US Cannabis Council, agreed, saying, “President Trump supports moving cannabis to Schedule III, and he is nominating officials who are committed to enacting his agenda. We look forward to working with the new administration to finalize this historic shift away from the failed policies of the past.”
Other pointed out that public sentiment toward cannabis legalization remains high, and that will likely influence the direction taken with regard to the plant and its derivatives.
“With the overwhelming public support for cannabis policy change at a national level, we remain hopeful that newly appointed DEA Chief Derek Maltz and his team will prioritize a modern, science-based approach to cannabis regulation,” Socrates Rosenfeld, CEO and co-founder of Jane Technologies, said. “The future of cannabis in America depends on balanced leadership, continued progress toward federal reform, and addressing the deep societal harm caused by prohibition.”
Todd Friedman, director of strategic partnerships of DAG Facilities, added, “Derek Maltz has an impressive record as a DEA special agent, recognized for his efforts in combating drug trafficking, particularly fentanyl. … It is hoped that Maltz will recognize that a regulated cannabis industry can contribute to public safety and generate revenue for research and education, ultimately benefiting the community.”
Not too thrilled
Others were dismayed with the choice, dismissing the position that the president likely will continue to lead the charge.
“Although President Trump expressed support for cannabis legalization during his campaign, his second nominee to lead the DEA, Derek Maltz, does not align with pro-cannabis priorities,” said Paula Savchenko, founding partner of Cannacore Group and PS Law Group. “While Maltz undeniably brings extensive expertise to the role – having spent over two decades tackling drug cartels and the fentanyl crisis as a career special agent at DEA – his previous statements raise concerns about his ability to fairly oversee the already fragile cannabis rescheduling process.
“His outspoken opposition has led many industry stakeholders to view his appointment as the final blow to a contentious rescheduling process – one that has already faced accusations of being undermined by the DEA,” she added.
Many are hesitant to dismiss Maltz’s past statement and actions.
“The new acting DEA administrator is a lifelong drug war hawk whose outdated attitudes toward cannabis are out of step with those of most Americans. At a time when most Americans are demanding long overdue changes in federal cannabis policy, Derek Maltz epitomizes the failed policies and approaches of the past,” Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML, said.
Marc Beginin, founder and CEO of Prodigy Processing Solutions, also expressed concern. “Maltz’s vocal opposition to rescheduling cannabis risks stalling critical progress at a time when alignment with both science and public opinion is urgently needed,” he said. “Rescheduling to Schedule III would bring federal policy in line with scientific evidence, unlock funding for vital research, and ensure consistent safety and quality standards under FDA oversight.”
What’s next?
Maltz was named acting administrator and, as such, does not need congressional approval, unlike a formal nomination as the permanent administrator of the DEA.
Without that formal nomination to a permanent post, Maltz can serve in the acting capacity without congressional approval for an unlimited amount of time.
A Nebraska legislative committee voted 5-3 against advancing a bill designed to implement and regulate the state’s medical cannabis program, leaving legislators and advocates searching for alternative paths forward, according to the Nebraska Examiner.
The General Affairs Committee rejected Legislative Bill 677, sponsored by State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, during a Thursday vote where committee members declined to offer amendments to the legislation, the publication reported.
“I don’t want to shut all the doors right now, but some doors are closing, and they’re closing fast, and so we have to act,” Hansen told reporters after the vote, according to the Examiner.
Nebraska voters approved medical cannabis in November 2024, with residents legally permitted to possess up to 5 ounces with a healthcare practitioner’s recommendation since mid-December. However, the regulatory commission created by the ballot initiative lacks effective power and funding to regulate the industry.
Hansen described his legislation as “a must” for 2025 to prevent a “Wild West” scenario in the state’s cannabis market. The bill would have expanded regulatory structure through the Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission and extended deadlines for regulations and licensing to allow more time for implementation, the Examiner noted.
Committee disagreements centered on proposed restrictions. A committee amendment would have prohibited smoking cannabis and the sale of flower or bud products while limiting qualified healthcare practitioners to physicians, osteopathic physicians, physician assistants or nurse practitioners who had treated patients for at least six months.
The amendment also would have limited qualifying conditions to 15 specific ailments including cancer, epilepsy, HIV/AIDS, and chronic pain lasting longer than six months.
State Sen. Bob Andersen of Sarpy County opposed allowing vaping due to concerns about youth drug use, while committee chair Rick Holdcroft suggested selling cannabis flower would be “a gateway toward recreational marijuana,” a claim Hansen “heavily disputed,” according to the Examiner.
Hansen now faces a difficult path forward, requiring at least 25 votes to pull the bill from committee and then needing 33 senators to advance it across three rounds of debate, regardless of filibuster attempts.
Crista Eggers, executive director of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, remained optimistic despite the setback.
“This will not be the end,” Eggers said, according to the outlet. “Giving up has never been an option. Being silenced has never been an option. It’s not over. It’s not done.”
The legislative impasse is further complicated by ongoing litigation. Former state senator John Kuehn has filed two lawsuits challenging the voter-approved provisions, with one appeal pending before the Nebraska Supreme Court. The state’s Attorney General is also trying to do something about the hemp question, akin to other states across the country.
Nevada’s cannabis lounge experiment faces some expected growing pains, with one of just two state-licensed venues closing its doors after barely a year in business, according to the Las Vegas Weekly.
“The regulatory framework, compliance costs and product limitations just don’t support a sustainable business model,” said Thrive Cannabis managing partner Mitch Britten, who plans to convert the space into an event venue until regulations loosen up.
The closure leaves Planet 13’s Dazed Consumption Lounge as the only operational state-regulated cannabis lounge in Nevada. Dazed manager Blake Anderson estimates the venue attracts around 250 customers daily, primarily tourists. One other establishment, Sky High Lounge, has operated since 2019 on sovereign Las Vegas Paiute Tribe land exempt from state regulations.
Even with Nevada regulators conditionally approving 21 more lounge licenses, potential owners are struggling to meet the $200,000 liquid assets requirement – particularly social equity applicants from communities hit hardest by prohibition.
Recreational marijuana has been legal statewide since 2017, but public consumption remains prohibited. That’s created an obvious disconnect for the millions of tourists who visit Las Vegas annually but have nowhere legal to use the products they purchase. The state recorded roughly $829 million in taxable sales during the 2024 fiscal year.
“It always comes down to money, and it’s difficult to get a space if you can’t afford to buy a building. On top of that, getting insurance and finding a landowner who’s willing to lease to a cannabis business is a challenge in and of itself,” said Christopher LaPorte, whose consulting firm Reset Las Vegas helped launch Smoke and Mirrors, told Las Vegas Weekly.
Many think the key to future success lies in legislative changes that would allow lounges to integrate with food service and entertainment – playing to Las Vegas’s strengths as a hospitality innovator. In the meantime, the industry will continue to adapt and push forward.
“Things take time,” LaPorte said. “There’s a culture that we have to continue to embrace and a lot of education that we still have to do. But at the end of the day, tourists need a place to smoke, and that’s what these places are.”
Psyence Group Inc. (CSE: PSYG) told investors that it will be consolidating all of its issued and outstanding share capital on the basis of every 15 existing common shares into one new common share effective April 23, 2025 with a record date of April 23, 2025. As a result of the consolidation, the issued and outstanding shares will be reduced to approximately 9,387,695 on the effective date.
This is the second time a Psyence company has consolidated shares recently. In November, its Nasdaq-listed associate, Psyence Biomedical Ltd. (Nasdaq: PBM), implemented a 1-for-75 share consolidation as the psychedelics company worked to maintain its Nasdaq listing.
Psyence Group reported earnings in February when the company delivered a net loss of C$3 million and was reporting as a going concern. At the end of 2024, the company said it had not yet achieved profitable operations, has accumulated losses of C$48,982,320 since its inception.
Total assets at the end of 2024 were C$11,944,478 and comprised predominantly of: cash and cash equivalents of C$10,611,113, other receivables of C$159,808, investment in PsyLabs of C$1,071,981 and prepaids of C$68,243.
Still, the company is pushing ahead. Psyence told investors that it has historically secured financing through share issuances and convertible debentures, and it continues to explore funding opportunities to support its operations and strategic initiatives. “Based on these actions and management’s expectations regarding future funding and operational developments, the company believes it will have sufficient resources to meet its obligations as they become due for at least the next twelve months,” it said in its last financial filing.
The company said it believes that the consolidation will position it with greater flexibility for the development of its business and the growth of the company.