Connect with us

featured

Florida Case On Medical Marijuana Patients’ Gun Rights Is On Hold As Supreme Court Weighs Underlying Issue

Published

on


A federal court has agreed to delay proceedings in a years-long Florida-based case challenging the constitutionality of the ban on gun ownership by people who use medical marijuana, with the Justice Department arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to take up a related dispute warrants a stay in the lower court.

The Supreme Court accepted a petition for cert for the separate case, U.S. v. Hemani, last week to settle the question of whether the ban—known as Section 922(g)(3)—is consistent with the Second Amendment.

With that potentially precedent-setting judgement now pending, DOJ submitted a motion—which was unopposed by the plaintiffs—requesting that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida hold the matter at least until “the Supreme Court’s resolution” in Hemani.

The Trump administration further said a pause in the proceedings is necessary due to the government shutdown, which has deprived DOJ of resources and prohibits the agency’s attorneys “from working except in certain limited circumstances.”

“Granting a stay would promote judicial economy and the efficient use of resources of the Court and the parties,” it said. “The resolution of Hemani will almost certainly have a significant impact on this case. The Supreme Court’s ruling on the constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) will likely shed significant light on the viability of Plaintiffs’ claims here and what factual development, if any, is necessary to determine whether the application of § 922(g)(3) is constitutional as applied to Plaintiffs.”

Chief U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor agreed in a brief order issued on Thursday.

“Defendants’ unopposed motion to stay pending resolution of United States v. Hemani (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED. This case is STAYED, and all deadlines are suspended,” he wrote. “Any party may move to lift the stay at any time.”

The plaintiffs in the Florida case are Vera Cooper and Nicole Hansell, who are registered medical cannabis patients denied gun purchases over their admission to participating in the program, and Neill Franklin, a former police officer who wants to access medical marijuana without jeopardizing his right to own a firearm.

In August, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District, in a opinion authored by Judge Elizabeth Branch, departed from the district court’s earlier ruling that upheld Section 922(g)(3). It was a win for the plaintiffs, though the case was remanded back to the lower court and remains unsettled.

Former Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried (D) initially led the suit against the federal government, but she was removed from the case after leaving her state office. The Republican commissioner who replaced her declined to become involved in the legal proceedings. Fried is now chair of the Florida Democratic Party.

While the Supreme Court last Monday also declined to take up a separate case on cannabis consumers’ gun rights, there are still several others pending a decision from the justices. But the choice to take up Hemani in particular is likely welcome news to the Justice Department, which has consistently defended the firearm prohibition and specifically requested that SCOTUS review that case instead of alternatives.

That could be related to the fact that the defendant is not only a marijuana consumer but also a user of cocaine who’s sold drugs in the past, so it’s possible DOJ reasoned that he is a less sympathetic face for the issue. Defendants in the other cases were merely found in possession of both a firearm and marijuana.

In June, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, an appointee of President Donald Trump, submitted a filing with the Supreme Court that said “Section 922(g)(3) complies with the Second Amendment,” and the statute “targets a category of persons who pose a clear danger of misusing firearms: habitual users of unlawful drugs.”

The law “bars their possession of firearms only temporarily and leaves it within their power to lift the restriction at any time; anyone who stops habitually using illegal drugs can resume possessing firearms,” Sauer said.

Notably, while the government mentions “habitual” users of illegal drugs 40 times in its filing, that word does not itself appear in 922(g)(3). The language of the statute prohibits anyone “who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” from purchasing or possessing firearms or ammunition.

In a separate August filing for the case, the Justice Department also emphasized that “the question presented is the subject of a multi-sided and growing circuit conflict.” In seeking the court’s grant of cert, the solicitor general also noted that the defendant is a joint American and Pakistani citizen with alleged ties to Iranian entities hostile to the U.S., putting him the FBI’s radar.

The court also recently denied a petition for cert in another gun and marijuana caseU.S. v. Baxter, but that wasn’t especially surprising as both DOJ and the defendants advised against further pursing the matter after a lower court reinstated his conviction for being an unlawful user of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm.

A number of federal courts in recent years have cast doubt on the legality of § 922(g)(3), finding generally that while the ban on gun ownership among drug users may not be entirely unconstitutional, there’s scant historical precedent for such a broad restriction of Second Amendment rights on an entire a category of people.

Meanwhile, in recent interviews with Marijuana Moment, several Republican senators shared their views on the federal ban on gun possession by people who use marijuana—with one saying that if alcohol drinkers can lawfully buy and use firearms, the same standard should apply to cannabis consumers.

Separately, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit last month sided with a federal district court that dismissed an indictment against Jared Michael Harrison, who was charged in Oklahoma in 2022 after police discovered cannabis and a handgun in his vehicle during a traffic stop.

The case has now been remanded to that lower court, which determined that the current statute banning “unlawful” users of marijuana from possessing firearms violates the Second Amendment of the Constitution.

The lower court largely based his initial decision on an interpretation of a Supreme Court ruling in which the justices generally created a higher standard for policies that seek to impose restrictions on gun rights.

The ruling states that any such restrictions must be consistent with the historical context of the Second Amendment’s original 1791 ratification.

The historical analogues that the Justice Department relied on to make the case that the ban is consistent included references to antiquated case law preventing Catholics, loyalists, slaves and Indians from having guns.

The circuit court, for its part, said that “the government must show non-intoxicated marijuana users pose a risk of future danger” to support the current policy. “This inquiry, which may involve fact finding, is best suited for the district court.”

As a recent report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) explained the current legal landscape, a growing number of federal courts are now “finding constitutional problems in the application of at least some parts” of the firearms prohibition.

In a recent ruling, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated a defendant’s conviction and remanded the case back to a district court, noting that a retrial before a jury may be necessary to determine whether cannabis in fact caused the defendant to be dangerous or pose a credible threat to others.

The Third Circuit separately said in a published opinion that district courts must make “individualized judgments” to determine whether 922(g)(3) is constitutional as applied to particular defendants.


Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.

Earlier this year, a federal judge in Rhode Island ruled that the ban was unconstitutional as applied to two defendants, writing that the government failed to establish that the “sweeping” prohibition against gun ownership by marijuana users was grounded in historical precedent.

A federal judge in El Paso separately ruled late last year that the government’s ongoing ban on gun ownership by habitual marijuana users is unconstitutional in the case of a defendant who earlier pleaded guilty to the criminal charge. The court allowed the man to withdraw the plea and ordered that the indictment against him be dismissed.

DOJ has claimed in multiple federal cases over the past several years that the statute banning cannabis consumers from owning or possessing guns is constitutional because it’s consistent with the nation’s history of disarming “dangerous” individuals.

In 2023, for example, the Justice Department told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that historical precedent “comfortably” supports the restriction. Cannabis consumers with guns pose a unique danger to society, the Biden administration claimed, in part because they’re “unlikely” to store their weapon properly.

Meanwhile, some states have passed their own laws either further restricting or attempting to preserve gun rights as they relate to marijuana.

Recently a Pennsylvania lawmaker introduced a bill meant to remove state barriers to medical marijuana patients carrying firearms.

Colorado activists also attempted to qualify an initiative for November’s ballot that would have protected the Second Amendment rights of marijuana consumers in that state, but the campaign’s signature-gathering drive ultimately fell short.

As 2024 drew to a close, the ATF issued a warning to Kentucky residents that, if they choose to participate in the state’s medical marijuana program that’s set to launch imminently, they will be prohibited from buying or possessing firearms under federal law.

The official said that while people who already own firearms aren’t “expected to” turn them over if they become state-legal cannabis patients, those who “wish to follow federal law and not be in violation of it” must “make the decision to divest themselves of those firearms.”

Since then, bipartisan state lawmakers have introduced legislation that would urge Kentucky’s representatives in Congress to amend federal law to clarify that users of medical marijuana may legally possess firearms, though no action has since been taken on that bill.

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D) said in January that he supported the legislature’s effort to urge the state’s congressional delegation to call for federal reforms to protect the Second Amendment rights of medical marijuana patients, but the governor added that he’d like to see even more sweeping change on the federal level.

Read the ruling and motion for a stay of the Florida medical marijuana and gun case below: 

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron at Patreon!



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

featured

Guess What Is Threading Its Way Back To Being Popular

Published

on


Guess what is threading its way back to being popular — Gen Z’s surprising new obsession is sew cool.

In a generational twist, young Americans are falling in love with their grandparents’ pastimes. From vinyl records spinning on turntables to typewriters clacking again on dorm desks, Generation Z and Millennials are breathing new life into analog culture. Now, they’re taking nostalgia one step further. You will never guess what is threading its way back to being popular now – sewing machines.

Across TikTok, Instagram, and even in big-box aisles at Costco, sewing is emerging as the latest hands-on hobby to stitch its way back into mainstream life.

RELATED: Immersive Events Redefine Millennial Nights

From gardening and journaling to reviving the look of thrifted 1980s windbreakers, Gen Z has turned “old-fashioned” into “on trend.” This generation values individuality, sustainability and creative expression — all things found in vintage-inspired pursuits. Just as vinyl and Polaroid cameras have made a comeback, sewing fits perfectly into the same ethos: it’s tactile, personal, and proudly non-digital.

The resurgence of hands-on creativity isn’t random. It’s a counterbalance to a world that’s often fast, online and disposable. In a sense, young people aren’t just buying less — they’re making more.

Costco’s sewing machine

Why Sewing Is Trending Again

1. Crafting identity and self-expression
For many, sewing is a declaration of independence from fast fashion. Customizing or making your own clothing offers a sense of empowerment — a creative outlet says, “I made this.” On social media, this translates into content celebrating originality, individuality and style over mass production.

2. Sustainability and slow fashion
Gen Z and Millennials care deeply about sustainability. Sewing gives them a way to reuse, repurpose and repair, rather than toss and replace. Visible mending — repairing clothing in a way shows off the stitches as part of the design — has become a viral movement on TikTok.

3. Screen-break creativity
With most of life lived online, sewing provides an analog escape. It’s hands-on, calming and meditative — a way to literally disconnect from screens. A recent Fortune article noted  many young adults are learning to sew “to get off their phones and save money.”

4. The social media effect
TikTok and Instagram have made sewing trendy, not tedious. Hashtags like #sewingtutorial, #upcycledfashion and #thriftflip are filled with videos showing transformations from thrift-store finds to high-fashion looks. Tutorials and time-lapse reels make the craft feel approachable and rewarding — especially when the finished product is instantly shareable.

RELATED: The Connection Between Country Music And Cannabis

When a major retailer starts stocking modern sewing machines, you know something’s changing. Costco now offers sleek, computerized models like the Singer Heavy Duty 8832 and Brother XR3340, complete with LCD screens, hundreds of stitch patterns, and built-in quilting options. These aren’t your grandmother’s machines — they’re tech-forward tools align with the DIY spirit of younger shoppers.

The fact Costco, known for bulk groceries and electronics, now markets sewing machines signals just how mainstream this revival has become. The craft aisle isn’t just for hobbyists anymore — it’s for creators, side-hustlers and trendsetters.

On Instagram and TikTok, sewing creators are building large, loyal followings. Whether it’s a 20-second video of a thrifted denim jacket getting a new lining or a full tutorial on turning curtains into dresses, sewing content fits perfectly into Gen Z’s creative economy. It’s visually satisfying, shareable, and aspirational in a grounded way — making something from nothing.

Younger users are even reframing the stereotype of sewing as something only grandmothers do. Many proudly show off learning from older relatives while adding a modern twist, connecting generations through thread and fabric.



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading

featured

39 Attorneys General Tell Federal Lawmakers to Ban Hemp THC Products

Published

on


The chief law officers from 37 states and two U.S. territories sent a letter Oct. 24 to U.S. House and Senate committee leaders, asking them to stop “dangerous and intoxicating” hemp-derived THC products from being sold and manufactured.

The bipartisan coalition of 39 attorneys general, including those from Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, asked that Congress redefine hemp to close what many have termed an unintended “loophole” in the 2018 Farm Bill, which federally legalized the commercial cultivation of hemp.

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, along with his counterparts from Indiana (Todd Rokita), Connecticut (William Tong) and Minnesota (Keith Ellison), spearheaded the letter that they signed with other members of the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG).

Advertisment: Frank Mayer » Frank Mayer Order 84 » CBT ROS Medium Rectangle 300x250 October 2025 » Frank Mayer CBT Web Ad - July 2025.jpg

“Since the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp-derived THC products – often more potent than marijuana – have flooded the market due to a misinterpretation of the bill’s language,” Griffin said in a separate press release. “These synthetic cannabinoids, including delta-8, delta-10, THC-O, and others, are being sold in gas stations, convenience stores and online retailers across the country, frequently in packaging purposefully designed to appeal to children.”

Advertisment: Frank Mayer » Frank Mayer Order 84 » CBT ROS Medium Rectangle 300x250 October 2025 » Frank Mayer CBT Web Ad - July 2025.jpg

The attorneys general sent the letter to the Appropriations and Agriculture committee chairs in both the Senate and House, including Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine; Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark.; Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla.; and Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson, R-Pa.

Advertisment: Emerald Harvest » Emerald Harvest Order 115 » CBT ROS Leaderboard Ad 728x90 October 2025 » eh-360-web-banner-728x90

The letter signers asked the congressional leaders to clarify the definition of hemp through the fiscal 2026 appropriations process or through the farm bill’s pending reauthorization to “leave no doubt that these harmful products are illegal.” The letter signers asked that Congress criminalize the sale and manufacture of intoxicating hemp products.

“Intoxicating hemp-derived THC products have inundated communities throughout our states due to a grievously mistaken interpretation of the 2018 Farm Bill’s definition of ‘hemp’ that companies are leveraging to pursue profits at the expense of public safety and health,” the attorneys general wrote. “Many of these products – created by manufacturers by manipulating hemp to produce synthetic THC – are more intoxicating and psychoactive than marijuana, a Schedule I controlled substance, and are often marketed to minors. Unless Congress acts, this gross distortion of the 2018 Farm Bill’s hemp provision will continue to fuel the rapid growth of an underregulated industry that threatens public health and safety and undermines law enforcement nationwide.”

In addition to the abovementioned states and territories, the letter was also signed by attorneys general from Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and Wyoming.

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who championed the federal legalization of commercial hemp cultivation in 2018 as a pathway for Kentucky’s struggling tobacco farmers to benefit from a new agricultural commodity, said in July that he had never intended for the farm bill to “open the door to the sale of unregulated, intoxicating, lab-made, hemp-derived substances with no safety framework.”

That admission came as 27 Senate Appropriations Committee members voted unanimously to approve a 136-page spending bill that included language to ban hemp-derived products containing synthetic compounds and/or quantifiable amounts of THC or THCA, or other cannabinoids that have similar effects on humans or animals. McConnell termed the language as a legislative fix to align with the original intent of the 2018 Farm Bill.

However, Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., who chairs the Appropriations Agriculture-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) subcommittee, notified reporters later in July that the hemp THC product language was struck by a manager’s amendment before final passage. The language was pulled because Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., threatened to block the entire legislation, which includes more than $27 billion in discretionary funding to support farmers, rural communities and nutrition programs, if the hemp language wasn’t stricken.

Paul, who supports regulation over prohibition, said in September 2024 that he hopes to protect the legalized hemp industry by preventing the federal government “from weighing down our farmers with unnecessary bureaucratic micromanaging.”

As many states have already implemented laws to regulate or ban consumable products containing hemp derivatives, many believe Paul’s pushback at the federal level has only delayed the inevitable. A finalized agriculture spending bill has yet to pass Congress.

“Congress never meant to legalize these products in the 2018 Farm Bill,” the 39 attorneys general wrote. “A proper interpretation of the farm bill’s hemp provision demonstrates that the entire synthetic THC industry rests on a foundation of illicit conduct. Clear direction from Congress is needed to shut down this industry before it metastasizes further into an even greater threat to public safety than it already is.”

While the bipartisan coalition said that the 2018 Farm Bill intended to provide an industrial hemp commodity for the fiber and grain markets, the legislation’s 0.3% delta-9 THC on a dry-weight basis definition established an inadvertent ambiguity that has allowed “bad actors” to exploit the American public with “dangerous drugs” through highly advanced chemical processes.

The attorneys general pointed to the often-used chemical process of converting nonintoxicating CBD from the hemp plant into intoxicating delta-8 THC. The letter writers also pointed to laboratory-created or altered compounds like delta-10 THC, THC-O, THCP and HHC, which are then infused “at high concentrations into a multitude of products that can intoxicate a person as severely as the most potent strains of cannabis sold on the illicit market.”

“In other words,” the attorneys general wrote, “industry actors have nefariously misinterpreted the farm bill’s legalization of low concentrations of hemp-derived delta-9 and the bill’s silence regarding hemp-derived THC products other than delta-9 to claim that the farm bill allows them to produce and sell various synthetic cannabinoids regardless of the chemicals’ potency and psychoactive effects.”

The attorneys general said these “Frankenstein THC” products play by their own set of rules – including age restrictions, labeling standards and testing requirements – and have led to “stark and severe” public health consequences.

In Indiana, where medical and adult-use cannabis programs remain prohibited, total cannabinoid and analog exposures reported to poison control centers increased 41% between 2022 and 2024, with pediatric exposures under age 5 rising 46% and exposures among children aged 6–12 increasing 62%, according to the state’s Department of Health.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita was among the four signers who spearheaded the letter.

State-level efforts to rein in the hemp-derived cannabinoid product marketplace are not enough, according to the bipartisan coalition.

“Such efforts can only lead to an uneven and ineffectual patchwork of bans and regulations that differ from state to state and will not stop the flood of mail-order THC products from streaming through interstate commerce,” they wrote. “Congress must act to salvage the 2018 Farm Bill’s laudable legalization of commercial hemp from the psychoactive hemp industry’s spoliation of the bill’s hemp provision.”



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading

featured

Now Is the Time to Embrace, Not Abandon, Cannabis Activism

Published

on


This article originally appeared in High Times Magazine’s 50th Anniversary Print Issue. Order yours here and get it delivered to your door.

Political and societal changes rarely occur organically. They only happen when advocates agitate for them.

For over five decades, NORML and its grassroots supporters have advocated for ending the criminalization, discrimination, and stigmatization of cannabis consumers. We have been deliberate and diligent in our efforts to change the way people talk and think about the marijuana plant and those who consume it.

It’s been – and it remains – an uphill battle. Our movement challenges powerful special interests, like law enforcement. Our work is deeply underfunded. Our advocates are often underrepresented in the mainstream media and in the political arena. But we are winning nonetheless because our message is irrefutable: It makes no sense from a public health perspective, a fiscal perspective, or a moral perspective to arrest, prosecute, and incarcerate adults who choose to responsibly consume a substance that is objectively safer than either alcohol or tobacco.

Also read: Want Clean, Safe Cannabis? Home Grow And Legal Access Are The Answer

At the time of NORML’s founding, only about one in ten Americans believed that cannabis should be legal. Today, 70 percent of Americans support legalization. There are several reasons for this dramatic shift in public opinion. One: the devastating effects of prohibition – including the arrest of over 30 million Americans, disproportionately young and poor people, for violating marijuana possession laws – have been laid bare for all to see. Two: the successes of legalization – including the public health benefits provided by the growing acceptance of medical cannabis and the economic benefits provided by regulated markets – have become impossible to deny. As more jurisdictions have moved to legalize the plant for either therapeutic or recreational purposes, public support for these policies has increased exponentially. In short, the more the public has first-hand experience with legalization, the more they like it.

But just because we have won the hearts and minds of the public doesn’t mean that we have successfully won the legalization battle. In fact, in some respects, it’s made our fight that much harder.

Many supporters now believe, falsely, that nationwide legalization is some sort of fait accompli and therefore, there’s no longer a need for grassroots advocacy. This perception is woefully incorrect. Our political and cultural opponents have not gone away. In many cases, they have regrouped and re-strategized. Knowing that their side has lost the war of ideas, they’ve pivoted to targeting democracy itself – at times attacking and undermining the ballot initiative process, in other instances, overturning marijuana-related election results they disapprove of. In jurisdictions where cannabis is legal, they are chipping away at consumers’ hard-won freedoms by lobbying for arbitrary potency limits (which would re-criminalize certain cannabis products as well as those who produce and consume them), pushing for artificially high sale taxes, and calling on cities and towns to impose bans on marijuana-related businesses. 

Also read: Debunking Pot Potency Hysteria: The Truth About ‘Super-Strong’ Weed

Others presume that the corporate cannabis industry can sufficiently and successfully carry our movement to the next level. This is wishful thinking. While some players in the commercial cannabis space do provide limited financial support for grassroots activism, most cannot or do not. More concerningly, the interests of the cannabis industry do not always align with those of consumers. Issues that matter most to the cannabis community, such as securing home cultivation rights, expunging past criminal convictions, ending workplace discrimination, and strengthening parental rights, often get short shrift from industry players – who are far more likely to utilize their resources to lobby for changes in corporate tax codes and industry-specific regulations. In this vacuum, it is critical that activist groups like NORML and other grassroots organizers ensure that consumers’ voices, rather than corporate interests, remain prominent in the ongoing public policy debate. After all, there is no cannabis industry without cannabis consumers. 

Finally, it goes without saying that our movement’s objectives are not met until federal cannabis prohibition is repealed. Despite most states having now legalized cannabis, all these policies – and more importantly, those who provide and consume cannabis under these laws – are in violation of federal law and remain in jeopardy of potential federal prosecution. This fact won’t change until the cannabis plant is removed from the federal Controlled Substances Act entirely. Reclassifying cannabis to a lower status, like Schedule III, is not a sufficient long-term solution and, in fact, it will perpetuate the growing divide between state and federal marijuana policies. For states to truly legalize cannabis without the threat of undue federal interference, the government must abandon its long-standing ‘Flat Earth’ policies once and for all. In short, the need for grassroots consumer-driven advocacy is more important than ever. Now is not the time for the cannabis community to rest on the laurels of its past successes or to presume that someone else is going to finish the job. Historically, it’s been the efforts of dedicated advocacy groups like NORML (along with longtime ally High Times) that have represented our culture and demanded that it be recognized and respected. Ultimately, it is this same activist community that must continue to lead this fight, and it is our community that will ultimately liberate the cannabis plant and cannabis consumers from the shackles of prohibition.

This article originally appeared in High Times Magazine’s 50th Anniversary Print Issue. Order yours here and get it delivered to your door.

Paul Armentano is the Deputy Director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, America’s oldest cannabis consumers’ lobby. To become a member of NORML or to support NORML’s efforts, please consider making a donation here.

Photo by Luis Quintero on Unsplash



Source link

mscannabiz.com
Author: mscannabiz.com

MScannaBIZ for all you Mississippi Cannabis News and Information.

Continue Reading
featured20 minutes ago

Guess What Is Threading Its Way Back To Being Popular

featured1 hour ago

39 Attorneys General Tell Federal Lawmakers to Ban Hemp THC Products

featured2 hours ago

Now Is the Time to Embrace, Not Abandon, Cannabis Activism

featured3 hours ago

No One Is Giving Your Kids Marijuana Edibles in Their Halloween Candy

featured5 hours ago

Florida Case On Medical Marijuana Patients’ Gun Rights Is On Hold As Supreme Court Weighs Underlying Issue

featured6 hours ago

CULTA Appoints Cannabis Industry Veteran Joseph Andreae as CEO

featured7 hours ago

The Creature from the Black Leather Lagoon

featured9 hours ago

Cannabis industry case challenging prohibition hits Supreme Court (Newsletter: October 27, 2025)

featured1 day ago

I Worked a Day as a Budtender in Brooklyn: Here’s What I Learned

featured1 day ago

Trump’s ‘Stupid’ Drug War Killings Put Military In Untenable Position, Former GOP Attorney General Of Idaho Says (Op-Ed)

featured1 day ago

Oregon Officials Seek To Dismiss Psilocybin Access Lawsuit From Homebound Patients

featured2 days ago

South Dakota Medical Marijuana Advocates Alarmed After Lawmakers Give Prohibitionists A Platform

featured2 days ago

What Levi Strauss Can Teach Us About Craft and Cannabis

featured2 days ago

Michigan Lawmakers Consider Bills To Change Legal Marijuana Possession Limits And Alter Industry Disciplinary Rules

featured3 days ago

Bad Stoner Horror: The 10 Worst-Rated 420 Scary Movies

featured3 days ago

Vee the Traveling Cannabis Writer Unveils First Book in Cannabis Legacy Series – Ganjapreneur

featured3 days ago

[Video] G Herbo: Snoop Rolled My Blunt and Let Me Hit It, Smoking A Zip a Day, Chicago Munchies (Weird) and What’s Next

featured3 days ago

Marijuana Companies Ask U.S. Supreme Court To Take Up Case Challenging Constitutionality Of Federal Prohibition

featured3 days ago

The Odds Of The Feds Making A 2025 Cannabis Change

featured3 days ago

The Epic High Times Cannabis Cup Journey, From Amsterdam to the Empire State

featured3 days ago

GOP Senator Pushes To Study—Rather Than Ban—Hemp Products, As State Attorneys General Call For THC Prohibition

featured3 days ago

Happy International Champagne Day – The Fresh Toast

featured3 days ago

Maryland Police Want To Watch You Smoke Weed: Free Munchies and Ride Home Included

featured3 days ago

More Americans Now Use Marijuana Than Smoke Cigarettes, New Study Shows

California Cannabis Updates1 year ago

Alert: Department of Cannabis Control updates data dashboards with full data for 2023 

Breaking News1 year ago

Connecticut Appoints The US’s First Cannabis Ombudsperson – Yes there is a pun in there and I’m Sure Erin Kirk Is Going To Hear It More Than Once!

best list1 year ago

5 best CBD creams of 2024 by Leafly

Business1 year ago

Recreational cannabis on ballot for third time in South Dakota

Business1 year ago

EU initiative begins bid to open access to psychedelic therapies

cbd1 year ago

New Study Analyzes the Effects of THCV, CBD on Weight Loss

Bay Smokes1 year ago

Free delta-9 gummies from Bay Smokes

autoflower seeds1 year ago

5 best autoflower seed banks of 2024 by Leafly

cannabis brands1 year ago

Discover New York’s dankest cannabis brands [September 2024]

California1 year ago

May 2024 Leafly HighLight: Pink Runtz strain

Hemp1 year ago

Press Release: CANNRA Calls for Farm Bill to Clarify Existing State Authority to Regulate Hemp Products

best list1 year ago

5 best THC drinks of 2024 by Leafly

Mississippi Cannabis News1 year ago

Local medical cannabis dispensary reacts to MSDH pulling Rapid Analytics License – WLBT

best list1 year ago

6 best CBD gummies of 2024 by Leafly

Breaking News1 year ago

Curaleaf Start Process Of Getting Their Claws Into The UK’s National Health System – With Former MP (Resigned Today 30/5/24) As The Front Man

Mississippi Cannabis News1 year ago

Horn Lake denies cannabis dispensary request to allow sale of drug paraphernalia and Sunday sales | News

best list1 year ago

5 best delta-9 THC gummies of 2024 by Leafly

Arkansas1 year ago

The Daily Hit: October 2, 2024

Mississippi Cannabis News1 year ago

Mississippi city official pleads guilty to selling fake CBD products

Breaking News1 year ago

Nevada CCB to Accept Applications for Cannabis Establishments in White Pine County – “Only one cultivation and one production license will be awarded in White Pine County”

best list1 year ago

5 best THCA flower of 2024 by Leafly

Breaking News1 year ago

Weekly Update: Monday, May 13, 2024 including, New Guide for Renewals & May Board meeting application deadline

best list12 months ago

6 best hemp pre-rolls of 2024 by Leafly

Breaking News1 year ago

PRESS RELEASE : Justice Department Submits Proposed Regulation to Reschedule Marijuana

Trending